top of page
All Posts
Apple Sues OpenAI Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft by Former Employees
A federal judge orders OpenAI to turn over hiring records as Apple accuses the AI company of poaching employees and their confidential knowledge. Here is what every business owner should know about trade secret protection.
6 hours ago
Adidas Sues Australian Fashion Brand White Fox Over Four-Stripe Design
Adidas filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in Australia’s Federal Court against White Fox Boutique, alleging the retailer’s four-stripe clothing design is deceptively similar to its iconic three-stripe mark. The case highlights why consistent trademark enforcement and thorough clearance searches are essential for every business.
1 day ago


What Business Owners Can Learn from the Huawei-Qualcomm Patent Deal
Huawei and Qualcomm just signed a sweeping patent deal covering 5G, AI, and computing. Here is what the agreement teaches business owners about cross-licensing, standard-essential patents, and the strategic value of intellectual property.
2 days ago
Joby Aviation Hit with $116.9 Million Trade Secret Verdict Over Air Data Probe Technology: What This Means for Businesses Sharing Proprietary Information
A federal jury awarded Aerosonic approximately $116.9 million after finding that Joby Aviation breached a nondisclosure agreement and willfully misappropriated trade secrets related to air data probe technology. The case highlights the serious financial consequences of mishandling proprietary information shared under confidentiality agreements.
5 days ago
AI Company TradeSun Sues OpenAI Over 'Astra' Trademark for GPT-6: What This Means for Businesses Choosing a Brand Name
TradeSun Inc. filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that OpenAI's use of 'Astra' for its GPT-6 model infringes TradeSun's federally registered trademark for its AI software platform. The case highlights the legal concept of reverse confusion and why businesses of all sizes must conduct thorough trademark searches before adopting a new brand name.
6 days ago
Apple's Patent Bill Grows to $818 Million as Court Adds $184 Million in Interest: What This Means for Patent Holders
A federal judge added $184 million in prejudgment interest to Apple's $634 million patent verdict in the Masimo pulse-oximetry case, bringing the total to approximately $818 million. The ruling reinforces a critical lesson for patent holders about the full financial consequences of infringement.
Oct 7
Apple Sues OpenAI for Systematic Trade Secret Theft: What This Means for Businesses Protecting Confidential Information
Apple filed a federal lawsuit alleging OpenAI systematically recruited Apple employees and directed them to steal confidential product information. The case offers critical lessons for any business that relies on proprietary information to maintain its competitive edge.
Oct 6
Federal Judge Allows Union Trademark Fight Over Starbucks Name and Logo to Proceed
A federal judge denied Starbucks' motion to dismiss a union's trademark lawsuit, allowing Workers United to continue using the Starbucks name and a modified version of its iconic logo. The case raises critical questions about nominative fair use and the limits of trademark enforcement.
Oct 5
Apple Hit with Record $5.7 Billion Patent Verdict Over Haptic Technology: What This Means for Patent Holders
A California federal jury awarded Taction Technology $5.7 billion after finding Apple infringed two haptic feedback patents, marking the largest patent verdict in U.S. history. The case carries critical lessons for patent holders and businesses developing technology-driven products.
Sep 29
One Wrong Jury Instruction Wiped Out a $40 Million Trade Secret Verdict: What the Comet Technologies Case Means for Your Business
The Ninth Circuit reversed a $40 million trade secret verdict because the trial court gave the jury an instruction based on the wrong law. The Comet Technologies case offers critical lessons about the differences between federal and state trade secret claims and why the details of litigation strategy matter.
Sep 28
The Supreme Court Returns with 13 Patent Petitions on Its Docket: Why This Matters for Innovators
The Supreme Court returns for its fall 2026 long conference with thirteen patent-related cert petitions on the docket, covering major questions about IPR review, patent eligibility, and damages. Here is what innovators and business owners need to know.
Sep 24
Apple Sues OpenAI for Orchestrating Trade Secret Theft Through Departing Employees: Why Your Exit Procedures Matter
Apple filed a 41-page complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in July 2026, accusing OpenAI and its hardware subsidiary IO Products of orchestrating a systematic campaign to steal Apple's confidential product designs, manufacturing processes, and supply chain strategies. At the center of the lawsuit is Tang Tan, Apple's former Vice President of Product Design for the iPhone and Apple Watch, who left Apple after 24 years to become OpenAI's
Sep 23
New Balance Sues Decathlon Over Running Shoe Logo That Looks Too Much Like Its Iconic "N": What This Means for Brand Protection
New Balance filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Decathlon, alleging that the "K" logo on its Kiprun running shoes is virtually identical to New Balance's famous "N" mark. The case highlights key principles of trademark protection that every business owner should understand.
Sep 22
Surron Wins $13 Million Design Patent Verdict Against Rival Founded by Former Employees: Why Design Patents Matter
A jury awarded electric motorcycle maker Surron nearly $13 million after finding that a competitor founded by former Surron employees willfully infringed its design patent. The case highlights why design patents are a critical tool for protecting the look and feel of physical products.
Sep 21
A Competitor Created a Fake Company to Steal Trade Secrets: Why Controlling Access to Your Proprietary Software Matters
A federal judge ordered an insurtech startup to stop using trade secrets it obtained by creating a fake company to access a competitor's software. The case offers critical lessons about monitoring and controlling access to your proprietary business systems.
Sep 18
Buc-ee's Sues Ohio Mini Mart Over Beaver Logo: When Trademark Enforcement Sparks a Public Backlash
Buc-ee's filed a trademark lawsuit against a small Ohio mini mart over its beaver logo. The resulting public backlash highlights the importance of a measured trademark enforcement strategy for businesses of all sizes.
Sep 17
Apple Asks the Supreme Court to Limit the ITC's Power Over Patent Disputes
Apple has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to narrow a key rule governing patent disputes at the International Trade Commission. The case could reshape how the ITC evaluates complaints from patent holders who have not yet brought a product to market.
Sep 16
Apple's Trade Secret Lawsuit Against OpenAI: Why Protecting Confidential Information Before Employees Leave Is Critical
Apple filed a blockbuster trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI in July 2026, accusing the AI company of orchestrating a systematic effort to extract confidential engineering information through former Apple employees. The case escalated dramatically in late August when Apple presented forensic evidence from a former engineer's MacBook, alleging that confidential circuit schematics were downloaded and used at OpenAI. Apple further claims that evidence was deliberately destroyed
Sep 15
Taylor Swift Sued Over Album Name: What Reverse Confusion Means for Your Trademark
Taylor Swift faces a trademark lawsuit over her album name. Learn what reverse confusion means and why early trademark registration matters for every business owner.
Sep 14
Ugg Design Patent Thrown Out at Trial: Why a Design Patent Alone May Not Protect Your Product
A California jury delivered a surprising split verdict in June 2026 in the case of Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Last Brand Inc. (d/b/a Quince). The jury found that Quince's Australian Shearling Mini Boot infringed Deckers' design patent for the iconic Ugg Classic Ultra Mini, but simultaneously ruled that the design patent itself was invalid. In September 2026, a federal judge denied Deckers' request for a new trial, making the loss final. Despite proving that its boot desig
Sep 11
bottom of page
