Oreo Maker Sues Aldi Over Copycat Packaging: What Business Owners Should Know About Trade Dress
- Joseph Diorio
- 2 days ago
- 2 min read
Updated: 2 days ago

Mondelez International, the parent company behind Oreo, Chips Ahoy!, and Ritz, has filed a federal trademark infringement lawsuit against discount grocery chain Aldi, alleging that Aldi's store-brand products copy the distinctive packaging and trade dress of eight major Mondelez snack brands. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, has drawn attention from brands and retailers alike as it highlights the growing legal risks of the "copycat" product trend.
What Is Trade Dress and Why Does It Matter?
Trade dress refers to the overall visual appearance of a product or its packaging that signals to consumers where the product comes from. This can include color schemes, label layouts, packaging shapes, and graphic design elements. Under the Lanham Act, trade dress is legally protectable in the same way as a traditional trademark, provided it is distinctive and consumers associate it with a particular brand. When a competitor replicates those visual elements closely enough to cause consumer confusion, it may constitute trade dress infringement.
The Mondelez v. Aldi Dispute
In its complaint, Mondelez alleges that Aldi's private-label products sold under the "Benton's" and "Savoritz" names use packaging that closely mirrors the look of well-known Mondelez products, including Oreo, Chips Ahoy!, Nutter Butter, Ritz, Wheat Thins, Nilla Wafers, Premium saltines, and BelVita. According to the filing, Aldi's sandwich cookies feature a blue and white bag with a red logo in the upper left corner, a layout strikingly similar to Oreo packaging. Mondelez claims it previously contacted Aldi about these similarities, and while Aldi changed some products, the company continued the practice with others. This is not the first time Aldi has faced such allegations. An Australian federal court recently found Aldi liable for copying the packaging of a children's snack brand.
Key Takeaway for Business Owners
This case underscores the importance of protecting your brand's visual identity, not just your name and logo. If your business has developed distinctive packaging, product shapes, or design elements, those features may qualify for trade dress protection under federal law. Registering your trade dress with the USPTO strengthens your ability to take legal action against competitors who adopt confusingly similar designs. On the other side, if your business sells private-label or budget-friendly alternatives, it is critical to understand where the line falls between lawful competition and actionable infringement. Drawing inspiration from industry trends is one thing, but replicating another brand's overall look and feel can expose your business to costly litigation.
As private-label products continue to grow in popularity, disputes like Mondelez v. Aldi will only become more common. Business owners on both sides of the shelf should take proactive steps to understand and protect their trade dress rights.
Want to learn more about protecting your brand's packaging and trade dress? Schedule a free consultation with Diorio IP Law Group to discuss your options.



Comments